Monday, March 30, 2015

Wildlife corridor

Jeremy Sanders
Environmental Biology 105
Spring Semester 2015
Summary
Using a black bear corridor as a means to moderate some of the adverse ecological effects of habitat fragmentation for the Black Bear. This document discusses principles of evaluating and designing a wildlife corridor to facilitate use by black bears.
Introduction
The American Black Bear, or Ursus Americanus, can live in a variety of habitats. Because of their versatile diet, they inhabit both coniferous and deciduous forests as well as wide open areas. Currently, conservation efforts for black bears have been effective and in most areas, black bears are increasing and can sustain managed sport hunting. The key to successful co-existence between humans and bears is to recognize that it is no longer possible for either species to occupy all habitats but that where co-occupancy is possible and desirable. Most conflicts are the result of people unintentionally feeding bears, most often by allowing them access to household garbage or bird feeders. Although uncommon, black bear attacks on humans occasionally occur, especially in areas where they come in frequent contact with people and their food. Black bears can be found all over the United States. Black Bear habitat fragmentation leads to more human conflicts in Florida. During the week of April 22, 2014, between Ocala National Forest and Orlando, FL, human-black bear interaction made headlines. After a bear bit a woman in her garage. This problem is not new. Both bear and human populations in Florida have been growing since the 1970s.  
One temporal variation is when black bears become a nuisance because of their lack of food or fight for food. When humans and other animals fight for the same type of food is when black bears have a temporal issue. Their food habits are so in tune with other animals that sometimes the bears have no choice. Lucky enough the American Black Bear will eat a diversity of insects.
Creating this corridor, large enough to regulate the species, but also to avoid any spatial characteristics of an isolated bear. “The spatial memory and foraging strategies of four adult captive-born American black bears were explored in four experiments using a simulated foraging task. In the first three experiments, each session consisted of two phases separated by a delay: During the exploration phase, subjects foraged among a set of baited and un baited sites. During the delay, the same locations were re baited and subjects were released again and allowed to search the sites (search phase). In Experiments1a and 1b, different sites were baited each day and the interval between exploration and search was short (4 hr or 15 min). Subjects were not accurate at recovering the food items in either experiment. In Experiment 2, an “informed forager” paradigm was used in which one subject was given privileged knowledge about the location of the food during the exploration phase and was later released with an “uninformed” competitor during the search phase. The bears did not achieve above-chance recovery accuracy even in the presence of a competitor. In Experiment 3, the same two of four sites were continually baited and the bears were released simultaneously over a period of 20 days, with each baiting separated by 2 or 3 days. As a group, the bears’ foraging accuracy with repeated baiting and longer intervals approached greater than chance accuracy. Results suggest some limitations on bears’ use of spatial memory in captive environments, but reveal the potential for use of spatial memory over longer delays.” (Vonk)
When building this corridor there are some abiotic factors that must be taken into consideration. Bears depend on water and without water the bear’s won’t be able to survive for long and lose part of their diet which is fish. Not to mention fresh, clean, air. Without air, all things would stop living and the American black bear is no different. (http://americanblackbear96.weebly.com/habitat.html)
In some parts of the country we are noticing a decline in the black bear population. Black bears use trees for feeding and marking purposes, both resulting in cambial damage, which reduces growth rates and can increase mortality rates. This edge effect is strongly impacted by human activities including forest management and supplemental feeding. Another issue, also caused by humans, is with light pollution. While light at night can be beneficial, neutral, or damaging for individual species, its presence invariably disturbs ecosystems. For example. Some species of spiders avoid lit areas, while other species are happy to build their spider web directly on a lamp post.
Building this wildlife corrido will cause the impediment for black bears from their biggest predator, humans. The design with be based on the black bears core habitat to help the bear adapt to its surroundings well. Regardless of how man made this corridor will be, we will do our very best to utilize the topography the bears are already used to. That way when the bears wake up they won’t begin to have an instant drop in the birth rate.
We will be using this geographic isolation to help the increase in black bear population. Thus far, threats only exists in a few isolated places. American black bears are found through much of Canada, the United States, and the northern half of Mexico. This corridor is going to have to be somewhat of an adaptive management style. Bear populations are not going to remain the same. They’re going to change over time. One issue that we would like to avoid is the inbreeding of the black bear. The reason for this is, in general, it is quite bad for a population or an organism to be very inbred. There is a well studied, although, only partially understood phenomenon called inbreeding depression. This genetic interchange is helped when black bears kick out males from families to avoid them mating with females.
This corridor will assist with the black bear to live freely and to be able to hunt and sleep and mate in a matter that is not in any way disruptive towards humans or the other way around. The corridor will be home to species such as plants, reptiles, amphibians, birds, insects, and small mammals. There will also be a small, man made, river to allow fish to move up and down the river and to allow the black bears to catch the fish as if they were still in the wild. The corridor will be extremely expensive but we feel that doing this will start a snow ball effect to let the species thrive. Once we get the bears to a safe mark, we will re-introduce them into the wild. The important thing is to maintain minimal human-animal interaction. In Mexico all hunting seasons for American black bears have been closed since 1985, and the species is considered nationally endangered. The Louisiana black bear, a subspecies of American black bear, was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 1992 because of severe loss and fragmentation of its habitat. The wildlife corrido will need to have 15.8 million acres. 9.5 million that are already protected and 6.3 million acres of remaining opportunity area that do not have conservation status. The exact proportion of the opportunity area that needs to be protected for functional connectivity within the corridor has not yet been determined. Protected areas include 4.7 million acres of federal land, 4.5 million acres of state land, 162,776 acres of country and city land and 204,232 acres of private land with permanent conservation status. There are 1.46 million acres within the Corridor opportunity area that are high priority for conservation through the Forever program and approximately 600,000 acres that are priorities for conservation through US Fish & Wildlife Services Greater Everglades Program. The Corridor provides habitat for 42 federally listed endangered species, 24 threatened species and 15 candidate species. At the state level, there are an additional 176 species listed as endanged, 56 as threatened and 29 as species of special concern. Examples of threatened and endangered species include Crested Caracara, Everglades Snail Kite, Florida Grasshopper Sparrow, Florida Scrub-Jay, Red-Cockaded Woodpecker, Whooping Crane, Wood Stork, Florida Panther, West Indian Manatee, Green Turtle, Leatherback Turtle, Hawksbill Turtle, Gulf Sturgeon, Okaloosa Darter, Sand Skink, Eastern Indigo Snake, Frosted Flatwoods Salamander, Highland’s Tiger Beetle, Choctawatchee Beach Mouse, Piping Plover, Etonia Rosemary and Okeechobee Gourd. There are 992 named rivers and streams crossing the Corridor that include 1150 miles of designated paddling trails. There are also 920 miles of the Florida National Scenic Trail within the Corridor.







 

















Sunday, March 8, 2015

BENEFITS OF GENETIC DIVERSITY LAB


Answers to the following questions as you work through the virtual lab. (I put this section on top because I was having issues with adding the graphs and table from the lab site.)

 

a.       At the beginning of the virtual lab, you were asked to sort eight lizards into categories. What criteria did you initially use to make your groups? I separated them from Green and Brown lizards.

 

b.      Did you revise your criteria later? Why? Yes I did, because I didn’t quite (still don’t) know how to label them. But I chose the new set because I learned that there’s more to it than just green and brown or long legged and short legged.

 

 

c.       An adaptation is a structure or function that is common in a population because it enhances the ability to survive and reproduce in a particular environment. Provide one example and an explanation of one adaptation in the Anolis lizards.

 

Anolis lizards are some of the best examples of both adaptive radiation and convergent evolution. Populations of lizards on isolated islands diverge to occupy separate ecological niches, mostly in terms of the location within the vegetation where they forage (such as in the crown of trees vs. the trunk vs. underlying shrubs). These divergences in habitat are accompanied by morphological changes primarily related to moving on the substrate diameter they most frequently encounter, with twig ecomorphs having short limbs, while trunk ecomorphs have long limbs.   (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anolis)

 

d.      Provide one evolutionary explanation for why lizards living in the same part of the habitat (i.e., grass) would have similar characteristics.

Because some lizards radiate independently, mostly, producing the same set of habitat specialists, termed ecomorphs.  

 

e.       What is an ecomorph? Provide one example from the virtual lab.

All the lizards from the lab are ecomorphs. Pulchellus is one example of an ecomorph. Ecomorphs are species with the same structural habitat.

f.        How is an ecomorph different from a species? A species is a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. Ecomorphs is a species of Lizard.

g.       Explain how a particular body feature of one of the lizard ecomorphs from the virtual lab is an adaptation to their particular niche. The A. cristatellus normally stay in trees for protection. If a predator approaches, the male extends his dewlap and runs away. Some live under the sand.   (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_crested_anole)


Data Table
1.     Your Measurements Table
Hindlimb Length
42.0 mm
48.4 mm
16.9 mm
30.9 mm
38.3 mm
46.0 mm
57.9 mm
15.6 mm
Body Length
48.3 mm
58.3 mm
34.3 mm
38.3 mm
41.8 mm
60.3 mm
63.7 mm
37.2 mm
Tail Length
112.7 mm
117.8 mm
40.1 mm
114.5 mm
146.1 mm
139.9 mm
128.9 mm
45.8 mm
Lamellae Count
45
31
25
32
29
46
31
21

 

Reference Measurements Table
A. evermanni
A. cristatellus
A. occultus
A. pulchellus
A. olssoni
A. coelestinus
A. cybotes
A. sheplani
Hindlimb Length
41.8 mm
49.0 mm
16.8 mm
30.8 mm
38.9 mm
45.5 mm
57.2 mm
15.2 mm
Body Length
47.7 mm
58.5 mm
34.3 mm
37.9 mm
41.8 mm
60.9 mm
63.3 mm
36.9 mm
Tail Length
113.0 mm
118.3 mm
39.8 mm
115.2 mm
147.2 mm
139.6 mm
129.1 mm
44.9 mm
Lamellae Count
45
31
25
32
29
46
31
21
Graph
46
0.91 mm
Continue
A. cybotes
31
0.42 mm
0.87 mm
A. coelestinus
21
45
0.83 mm
A. olssoni
A. evermanni
31
0.49 mm
A. cristatellus
25
0.81 mm
A. pulchellus
32
0.92 mm
Find the appropriate position on the graph for each species’ toepad lamellae counts and relative hindlimb length measurements. Then, drag each species name to that location. After you finish graphing your results, press "Continue" to see both graphs side by side.
Your Measurements Table
Open results table in a new window
Number of Lamellae versus Relative Hindlimb Length for Anole Ecomorphs
29
A. occultus
0.76 mm
Plotting Toepad versus Hindlimb Length
A.sheplani
Module 1: Ecomorphs
Back
↓  Drag  ↓
Relative Hindlimb Length
Lamellae Count
Attention
Continue Anyway
Redo Placement
The placement of the labels outlined in red do not match your measurements.
Attention
Continue Anyway
Redo Placement
The placement of the label outlined in red does not match your measurements.

Find the appropriate position on the graph for each species' relative tail length and relative hindlimb length measurements. Then, drag each species name to that location. After you finish graphing your results, press "Continue" to see a graph of toepad lamellae versus relative hindlimb length measurements.
Plotting Tail versus Hindlimb Length
Continue
Tail versus Hindlimb Length Measurements for Anole Ecomorphs
Your Measurements Table
Relative Hindlimb Length
Relative Tail Length
0.87 mm
0.83 mm
0.49 mm
0.81 mm
0.92 mm
0.76 mm
0.91 mm
0.42 mm
2.33 mm
2.02 mm
1.17 mm
2.99 mm
3.50 mm
2.32 mm
2.02 mm
1.23 mm
A. evermanni
A. cristatellus
A. pulchellus
A. occultus
A.sheplani
A. cybotes
A. coelestinus
A. olssoni
Open results table in a new window
Module 1: Ecomorphs
Back
↓  Drag  ↓
Attention
Continue Anyway
Redo Placement
The placement of the labels outlined in red do not match your measurements.
Attention
Continue Anyway
Redo Placement
The placement of the label outlined in red does not match your measurements.